Man taking notes while working on a laptop

Louisiana Product Liability Lawyers

When a product causes an injury, the fact that something went wrong does not automatically mean the manufacturer is legally responsible. The central question is whether the product was unreasonably dangerous under Louisiana law and whether that condition caused the injury.

Louisiana has a specific statute governing most claims against product manufacturers: the Louisiana Products Liability Act (LPLA). It recognizes four primary ways a product can be unreasonably dangerous: its construction or composition, its design, an inadequate warning, or its failure to conform to an express warranty.

Those rules can apply to products ranging from vehicles and industrial equipment to household products, prescription drugs, and medical devices.

Hair Shunnarah represents people throughout Louisiana who have been seriously injured by defective products, dangerous products, prescription drugs, and defective medical devices. We investigate how the product failed, what the manufacturer knew about the risk, whether safer alternatives existed when relevant, and whether the defect caused the injury.

Product Liability Cases We Handle

Product liability cases are not all built the same way.

A product may be manufactured incorrectly even though its overall design is safe. Another product may be made exactly as intended but have a dangerous design. In other cases, the product itself may perform as expected, but the manufacturer fails to adequately warn users about a risk.

Louisiana law treats those theories differently, which makes identifying how the product was allegedly defective an important part of evaluating a claim.

5 topics in this section

A manufacturing defect can occur when a particular product does not match the manufacturer's specifications or performance standards or differs from otherwise identical products made by the same manufacturer.

Louisiana law describes this as a product that is unreasonably dangerous in construction or composition.

Examples can involve:

  • Improperly assembled products

  • Faulty components

  • Contamination

  • Missing components

  • Manufacturing errors

  • Defects introduced during production

  • Products that fail to meet the manufacturer's own specifications

The distinction between a manufacturing defect and a design defect is important.

A manufacturing defect may affect a particular unit or production run even though the intended design itself is not defective. A design claim instead argues that the product was dangerous even when it was manufactured exactly as intended.

Preserving the actual product can be particularly important when a construction or manufacturing defect is suspected.

How Does Louisiana Product Liability Law Work?

Louisiana product liability claims are primarily governed by the Louisiana Products Liability Act, Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:2800.51 through 9:2800.60.

The Act establishes the theories under which a manufacturer can be liable for damage caused by a product.

Under the statute, a claimant generally must establish that the damage was proximately caused by a characteristic of the product that made it unreasonably dangerous and that the damage arose from a reasonably anticipated use of the product.

The LPLA recognizes four primary categories:

  • Construction or composition

  • Design

  • Inadequate warning

  • Failure to conform to an express warranty

The statute also provides that these theories establish the exclusive theories of liability against manufacturers for damage caused by their products under the Act.

That makes identifying the alleged defect much more important than simply proving that someone was injured while using a product.

What Is a Reasonably Anticipated Use?

Louisiana's product liability law does not require that an injured person use a product in only one exact way envisioned by its manufacturer.

Instead, the LPLA uses the concept of “reasonably anticipated use.”

The statute defines this as a use or handling of a product that the manufacturer should reasonably expect an ordinary person in the same or similar circumstances to make.

This can become an important issue when a manufacturer argues that the injured person misused the product.

The mere fact that a product was used differently from written instructions does not necessarily answer the question. The analysis can include whether the particular use or handling was something the manufacturer should reasonably have anticipated.

Who Can Be Responsible for a Defective Product Injury?

Product cases can involve multiple businesses between the manufacturer and the person who ultimately uses the product.

The Louisiana Products Liability Act focuses primarily on manufacturer liability, and its definition of manufacturer can extend beyond the company physically assembling the product in certain circumstances.

Depending on the facts and applicable law, the investigation may involve:

  • Product manufacturers

  • Component manufacturers

  • Companies that exercise control over manufacturing or product characteristics

  • Certain sellers that meet the statutory definition of a manufacturer

  • Other parties whose separate conduct contributed to the injury

The companies involved should not be assumed based solely on the brand name printed on the product.

Corporate relationships, component sourcing, manufacturing records, product labeling, distribution information, and the specific defect alleged can all affect which entities need to be investigated.

What Evidence Matters in a Product Liability Case?

Product liability cases can depend heavily on technical and physical evidence.

Depending on the product and alleged defect, relevant evidence may include:

  • The product itself

  • Packaging

  • Labels and warnings

  • Instructions and manuals

  • Receipts or proof of purchase

  • Product model and serial numbers

  • Photographs and video

  • Maintenance and repair records

  • Medical records

  • Product testing

  • Design documents

  • Manufacturing specifications

  • Internal company records

  • Prior complaints or incident reports

  • Recall information

  • Regulatory records

  • Expert inspection and testing

The physical product can be especially important.

If a vehicle component, appliance, tool, medical device, or other product is discarded, repaired, altered, or destroyed after an accident, potentially valuable evidence about how and why it failed may disappear with it.

When possible, a product suspected of causing an injury should be preserved in substantially the condition it was in after the incident rather than repaired, dismantled, returned, or thrown away before the potential claim is evaluated.

Does a Product Recall Prove the Manufacturer Is Liable?

No.

A recall can be important evidence, but the existence of a recall does not automatically establish that a particular injury was caused by a legally actionable product defect.

Likewise, the absence of a recall does not necessarily mean a product cannot be defective.

A recall may help identify a known problem, affected models or production periods, corrective measures, or information discovered after the product entered the market.

But an individual claim still requires evidence connecting the alleged defect to the product involved and the injury suffered.

For this reason, identifying the exact model, serial number, lot number, manufacture date, or other product information can be particularly important when a recall or safety notice exists.

What If a Product Was Used at Work?

A defective product injury can also happen on the job.

Industrial machinery, construction equipment, power tools, vehicles, safety equipment, and other products can cause serious workplace injuries when they fail.

An employee may have workers' compensation rights through the employer while also potentially having a separate product liability claim against a manufacturer or another responsible third party.

The two claims are not necessarily interchangeable.

Workers' compensation focuses on benefits available because the injury occurred in the course of employment. A product liability claim focuses on whether the product was legally defective and whether that defect caused the injury.

Determining exactly what failed and which company designed, manufactured, or supplied the relevant component can therefore reveal potential claims beyond workers' compensation.

How Long Do You Have to File a Product Liability Claim in Louisiana?

Louisiana product liability claims are subject to prescription rules that can depend on the circumstances and date of the injury.

For many product-related personal injury claims arising under current Louisiana law, Civil Code Article 3493.1 provides a two-year prescriptive period beginning on the day the injury or damage is sustained. The two-year provision became effective July 1, 2024.

Older injuries may be subject to different rules.

Product cases can also involve additional timing issues. Some injuries develop after repeated exposure or use, and cases involving pharmaceuticals or implanted medical devices may raise questions about when an injury occurred or became known.

The applicable deadline should therefore be evaluated based on the particular product, injury, dates, and claims rather than assuming every case follows the same timeline.

There is another practical reason to act earlier than the legal deadline: the product itself may be the most important piece of evidence in the case.

What If You Were Partially Responsible for the Injury?

Manufacturers may argue that an injured person used a product incorrectly, ignored instructions, modified it, or otherwise contributed to the accident.

Louisiana's comparative fault law can therefore become relevant.

For injuries governed by Louisiana's law effective January 1, 2026, a person who is 51% or more at fault generally cannot recover damages. If the injured person's share of responsibility is less than 51%, recoverable damages are generally reduced by that percentage.

That makes it important to distinguish between genuinely unforeseeable misuse and a use the manufacturer reasonably should have anticipated.

The product's design, warnings, instructions, actual use, and circumstances surrounding the injury can all become part of that analysis.

What Compensation May Be Available After a Defective Product Injury?

There is no standard settlement amount for a product liability claim.

The value depends on the nature and severity of the injury, medical treatment, future needs, financial losses, available defendants, strength of the evidence, and other circumstances.

Depending on the claim, damages may involve:

  • Medical expenses

  • Future medical treatment

  • Lost wages

  • Loss of future earning capacity

  • Physical pain and suffering

  • Mental and emotional suffering

  • Disability or physical limitations

  • Scarring or disfigurement

  • Rehabilitation

  • Property damage

  • Loss of consortium

  • Wrongful death damages when a defective product causes a fatal injury

A defective product can cause anything from a relatively limited injury to burns, amputations, brain or spinal injuries, organ damage, or death.

The appropriate evaluation should focus on the actual consequences of the defect and the harm it caused, not simply the type or price of the product involved.

What to Do If You Were Injured by a Dangerous or Defective Product

Preserving evidence can be particularly important after a product-related injury.

If possible:

  • Get appropriate medical care. Address the injury first and make sure the circumstances are accurately documented.

  • Keep the product. Do not throw it away, return it, repair it, or allow someone to alter it if it can be safely preserved.

  • Preserve packaging and instructions. Boxes, warning labels, manuals, inserts, and other materials may contain relevant information.

  • Document identifying information. Photograph model numbers, serial numbers, lot numbers, labels, and other product markings.

  • Take photographs and video. Document the product, damage, accident location, and visible injuries when appropriate.

  • Keep proof of purchase when available. Receipts, online orders, warranty information, and other records can help identify when and where the product was obtained.

  • Save communications. Preserve messages with the manufacturer, seller, healthcare provider, employer, or other parties concerning the product or injury.

  • Do not assume a recall is required. A product can potentially be defective even when no recall has been issued.

  • Consider having the product evaluated before it is altered. Physical evidence can become central to determining how a product failed.

Ways We Can Support You

Every trial attorney on our team is trained to fight aggressively for your rights. Here's how our team will help throughout the legal process.

1

Free Case Review

We'll review your claim and explain the best legal options available.

2

Claim Investigation

Our team gathers evidence and builds a strong case from the start.

3

Expert Negotiation

We deal directly with insurers to secure the maximum recovery possible.

4

Court Representation

If a fair settlement isn't possible, we're ready to fight for you at trial.

5

No-Win, No-Fee

We guarantee that you don't pay us unless we win your case.

Frequently Asked Questions About Product Liability in Louisiana

Injured by a Dangerous or Defective Product?

Determining why a product caused an injury can require much more than identifying what broke. Its design, manufacture, warnings, intended and reasonably anticipated uses, and the evidence preserved after the incident can all affect whether a claim exists.

Hair Shunnarah represents people throughout Louisiana who have suffered serious injuries involving defective products, dangerous drugs, and medical devices. We can investigate what happened, identify the companies involved, and evaluate the claim under Louisiana law.

Free consultation. No attorney fee unless we win your case.